Skip to story
StorySatva
My FeedIndiaOpinionsFinanceSports
StorySatva
My FeedIndiaOpinionsFinanceSports

Today’s Reads

1WorldRussia and Ukraine trade deadly strikes as toll rises in Kryvyi Rih2EconomyFSSAI issues 150 notices over misleading food ads3OpinionKerala needs a connected flood-warning system, not more data4CricketWhy Marnus Labuschagne’s Test case is under pressure5PoliticsBJP presses CBI probe in Jharkhand exam row6FinanceIndia’s partial e-commerce FDI opening may hurt competition7FootballMessi fined after slapping opponent in MLS draw
Today’s ReadsBrowse 7
1WorldRussia and Ukraine trade deadly strikes as toll rises in Kryvyi Rih2EconomyFSSAI issues 150 notices over misleading food ads3OpinionKerala needs a connected flood-warning system, not more data4CricketWhy Marnus Labuschagne’s Test case is under pressure5PoliticsBJP presses CBI probe in Jharkhand exam row6FinanceIndia’s partial e-commerce FDI opening may hurt competition7FootballMessi fined after slapping opponent in MLS draw
OpinionsOpinions
Save

Vanashakti verdict closes old EC route, leaves room for new scheme

Argument

The Supreme Court’s Vanashakti verdict, the author argues, closes the old route for regularising projects that started without prior environmental clearance, but leaves the Union government room to create a fresh statutory one-time scheme if it chooses. The judgment keeps the core rule intact: environmental clearance must come before construction or operations.

Continue →
← Back

Legal Impact

The distinction matters because the Court treats an administrative office memorandum as too weak to override the law, while saying a statutory notification under the Environment (Protection) Act could still be valid if it is tightly designed. For developers, that means no fresh applications under the earlier violation mechanisms, but a future lawful pathway is still possible in principle.

Counterpoints

The author warns that any new scheme must not become a standing ‘violate first, regularise later’ process, or it would weaken compliance incentives.

The government is under no obligation to act, so pending projects remain in limbo unless it chooses to frame a new notification.

Updated 21 Aug 2026
Sources (1)
  • The Hindu: The Vanashakti verdict is balanced and pragmatic
←PreviousNext→